That’s an extremely poor choice of sponsorship for that particular video, made me laugh quite a bit

Title: “Google’s Stance on Pixel Watch Repairs Sparks Controversy”

Summary: Google has recently confirmed that it does not offer repair options for cracked screens on its Pixel Watch, leaving frustrated owners to seek their own solutions. Despite the potential for repairability, Google’s warranty policy excludes accidental damage, leaving users with no official recourse for screen replacements. This lack of repair options raises concerns, especially as Google is expected to launch a new Pixel Watch 2 with a similar design. Meanwhile, California’s new right-to-repair act may force companies like Google to rethink their repair practices in the future.

Compared to original: 11% Generated with #ChatGPT

It can still be edited, it’s just being pre-filled if you post via the website

Not saying it’s sustainable (it isn’t), but Amazon has an insanely high turnover rate, partially because new employees bring a fresh perspective and new ideas. It brings new energy and creativity.

Ofc Amazon achieves that turnover rate by treating people like shit and sooner or later they’ll run out of new people.

[email protected]

I found it funny because it’s probably true. And since they live forever in the movie they were motivated to fix the planet for themselves. Not sure if that came across, but that’s what I meant.

Haha, I like this part:

[…] Gates responded: “Well, Steve, I think there’s more than one way of looking at it. I think it’s more like we both had this rich neighbor named Xerox and I broke into his house to steal the TV set and found out that you had already stolen it.”

Sure, if you say so. On a different note, I recently watched Paradise on Netflix, where you can basically live forever if you’re rich enough. In the background someone says on tv at one point something like “the climate crisis has been solved by the top 5 richest people”, which made me laugh quite a bit.

Too late, you already angered the android extremists. Come at me haters

I’m with you, but it seems like this post got taken over by passionate haters

Yeah I get what you’re saying. It’s still something entirely different to bomb yourself to death vs. to not do enough to stop a disease. And even with all the haters in here, I don’t think any reasonable person would want Steve Jobs dead, it’s not like he murdered people.

If I remember correctly, android was already under development, but huge changes were made after the iPhone came out.

Cancer did. And just because he could be a prick doesn’t mean he deserved to die so soon.

That’s more fitting. It’s a miss on Steve Jobs though. For one he didn’t kill himself, cancer did. And for another, just because he could be a prick doesn’t make him a bad person worth killing.

From what I’ve read he definitely had a strong personality and I don’t think anyone sees him as flawless. But that made for some very funny moments. And he definitely was the person that Apple needed at that time.

Haha that’s one way to keep a positive attitude ^^

They decide how to implement it themselves is what I mean by that, the user story doesn’t give technical implementation details and it doesn’t give a specific solution. It gives you the problem and reason

Okay different question then. Judging from your stance towards scrum, I’m assuming you have worked with it before and it didn’t go so well? What parts were terrible and how was it set up if I may ask?

If you haven’t already, I’d encourage you to take a look and read the book. At the very least it’s some interesting stories being told.

Developers don’t take control in scrum. They are empowered to work autonomously, which is a big difference. Devs provide the complexity of stories and the PO decides in what order the team is tackling them.

Scrum doesn’t mean everyone just does whatever they feel like.