From a first perspective it actually looks good! I think these kind of regulation were really needed. But i would like to hear your opinions!

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think it’s the first law that companies will take seriously as it has % penalty instead of traditional “part of doing business” fine.

        • max@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          It does force it, if I’m not mistaken. Rejecting all should be as easy as accepting all. The problem is with enforcement.

        • library_napper@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Google got severely fined for not making the reject all button as easy to click as the accept button. Now YouTube has the reject button 1-click in Europe

        • Rejecting must be as easy as accepting by law. If there’s an accept all button, there must be a reject all button. Google has taken this approach already.

          Sadly, this issue won’t be pressed until enough people file complaints with their DPAs. Many of them are overworked and underfunded by dumb shit already so you should report thr issues you care about

  • jsdz@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s some good stuff in there and it’s easy to cheer for some big new regulatory burdens being put on Google and Facebook, but it’s slightly chilling to think what it’d be like if they eventually try to apply it to the fediverse. It sets up teams of what it calls “trusted flaggers” for example, whose job it will be to scour the net for anything they believe to be “illegal content” and order it removed. I imagine they’d start with places like c/piracy, but once such a vast apparatus for net censorship is set up who knows where else it might start looking. They’ll use it to go after sellers of “counterfeit” goods as well. Imagine your instance admins being forced to go through some kind of appeals process to take down posts they don’t like, but being required to instantly take down posts the government doesn’t like.

    I don’t know, it’s pretty complicated but there are some reasons to be slightly worried about it I guess.