• knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Plus the founder is pro-censorship and weighting search results based on his own worldview.

    At this point Searx is the only viable option, both in terms of privacy and results. Yes it ultimately ends up using the backend of the big three, but with customizable layers of abstraction and behaviour.

  • FIST_FILLET@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    NO.

    1. it is US-based
    2. the CEO is the former founder of the “Names Database”

    for the love of god, use anything but DDG. Qwant is EU-based and has decent results, SearX is another one which lets you choose between instances (or host your own).

    please stop taking US “privacy” services seriously. i was hoping people would know better on here, compared to reddit

  • Milk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    DDG was known as the best option for search engines but then they started talking of censoring stuff and also it has Microsoft trackers and other problems. Yes, it is still better than Google, Bing and Yandex when talking of privacy but with search engines like Qwant and specially SearX (SearXNG) there’s no reason to use DDG over these.

  • PlasmaK@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    DDG still spies on you. It still better than google, i guess, but i personaly use disroot’s searx

  • UprisingVoltage@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly yeah. There’s been some controversies in the past, but for someone who’s looking for a zero-effort way to browse privately and support the privacy scene (DDG donates a lot of money) it’s a great choice. Wouldn’t recommend their browser/extensions though

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Definitely would agree with this. The best of a bad bunch. I use it for nearly all my search.

      Did see some sketchy stuff with the android app/browser so probably would avoid… and besides, I’m in a decades long relationship with firefox <3.

  • rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I ditched it after it dropped the operators like quotes, “OR”, “AND”, and “-” which hampers it’s usefulness to me.

  • sunflip@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I recently started using Kagi. The search result are super good, and no ads. You do have to pay tho. Another good one I like is presearch. Both of these have their own crawler, unlike most other search engines which rely on bing or Google.

  • svamp@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t DDG get caught allowing some Microsoft tracking and blocking some search results a couple of years back? Personally I use Firefox and starpage as a search engine.

  • codenul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Check out Mull browser. There’s mobile version as well for desktops. Its lightweight Firefox without any of the telemetry.

    • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the recommendation. I wonder if you’re confusing the DuckDuckGo browser with the DuckDuckGo search engine. I am assuming the post is about the search engine 🙃

  • candle_lighter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah but I find their search results aren’t as good an non-private options like Google. So I’ve always preferred search private engines that provide Google results. Startpage is a great one but if you want one that is open source LibreX is excellent and is better than other FOSS search engines like SearX and Whoogle IMO.

  • TiffyBelle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As with any search engine hosted by someone other than yourself, you essentially have to trust their privacy policy.

    DDG’s privacy policy is actually fairly simple:

    We don’t save your IP address or any unique identifiers alongside your searches or visits to our websites. We also never log IP addresses or any unique identifiers to disk. This means that when you use our services, we have no way to create a history of your search queries or the sites you browse.

    Assuming they’re doing what they say they’re doing, DDG is excellent for privacy.

    I personally use DDG, although echo some others that you may have to be a little more specific when searching for some things to get good results. If results aren’t to my liking, I’ll use some other privacy-respecting search engines such as Brave Search and Startpage.

    • Rooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The “Privacy Statement” of Brave Search is somewhat weird tbh. Not clear, Obfuscated.

      • TiffyBelle@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Their Privacy Policy page seems fairly straightforward to me:

        Brave Search is designed to be private by default. We don’t collect personal information about you, your device or your searches. We also don’t transmit information to the web that could be used to profile you or track you or learn anything about you. Your searches are private to YOU.

        We temporarily process IP addresses to detect and prevent bots in order to ensure the integrity and availability of the service for all users. IP addresses are not retained but are deleted within seconds.

        To me these are clear claims they do not store search terms or IP addresses. Period.

        Of course this is what they say. As with any third party search you have to trust they’re doing what they say.