Yes, as I call them dipshits

and I pointed out 00’s New Labour increased social spending, and British TFR can be even higher with a party that’s proper left instead of New Labour’s dipshit right

New Labour despite being dipshits did increase social spending including education during 2000 to 2008, just imagine how much higher with something a bit more proper

The part of population decline isn’t good if it’s cause is people unable to afford homes or stagnate wages.

Hell, in the UK Birthrates plummeted because of the sheer damage Tories have caused us since they took over in 2008

It’s pretty clear, after all broken clocks are right twice a day

Exactly!

In Contrast: Israel, Czech, Georgia, France, etc all support egg freezing and IVF

Nah, Tarzan was too weak as a human to get a mate

1. You are correct that material costs need to be addressed, and children are pretty much exotic pets
2. According to the article and google translating the links clicking around, many of them pay off medical copays, childcare services, and other costs. Not to mention this quote saying that local family policy is at best temporary without more national spending

The proactive strategies from these cities offer Japan a lifeline, providing a buffer without a comprehensive national policy and potential synergy if one is implemented.

Don’t insult God like that! h He have standards

The article talks about a study showing that housing prices won’t be affordable for current generations and express it’s a bad thing because of it hurts those generations causing a rise of mental illness and unmet family goals

How is that absurd?

Felt like people aren’t talking about the IMF forcing austerity on Argentina

It’s not like the CPC ever screwed an ally when trading in yuan.

cough Russia cough

Here is the first link

https://www.reddit.com/r/ukpolitics/comments/15gx5yu/tories_choices_not_millennials_britains/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1

Good to know, I thought it was in good faith!

It’s weird, but everything is well researched, verified, and cited.

If you want I can give you the Reddit user who originally posted the site and you can ask him if he is David

Anti China?

You mean critical of the government. They also been critical of the UK, US, and Korean governments. Not to mention why they are most critical of isn’t the traditional reasons, but by the fact they need to ramp up social spending but hasn’t

Also it seems they are cynical of the numbers coming out, which is a fair point considering the Chinese researchers has a history of overcounting, inflating numbers, and sugarcoating CCP policies

At worse you can say they are anti CCP like other western sources like you said, but at best they just critical of any government who doesn’t increase social spending

China is very active player and driving up events, especially as they may be working with nazi wannabes in the German government

deleted by creator

Jokes on the CCP, who is going to spend the cash to raise them?

Not to mention we saw this play out in Soviet Romania, and it was a shit show for that government in terms of political stability

Hard disagree; when I read it, all the links are working, seem to verify what the writer is saying, and all information can be collaborated with other sources

Edit: I seen this style before, Axios and Morning Brew does something similar