![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/gWmVEUZ94Z.png)
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there
That’s quite the false equivalence you’ve made there
Pretty sure Whole Foods had shitty conservative executives back then too didn’t they?
Would this look any different if it displayed average salary instead of iPhone price as a percentage of average salary?
This seemed like a big win until I saw the graph. Holy shit either reporting changed alot, or there’s a long way to go before things are even remotely okay.
Thank you. As someone who knows nothing about that religion this headline was extremely confusing to me
Tl;dr - some businesses will be impacted, but it probably won’t drag down our economy much at all.
Don’t apologize, this is fantastic! Know any resources that pertain to the Pacific Northwest?
Anyone know of a “how to” guidelines for doing this in different regions? I assume you need to have a forest succession plan where fast-growers go in first and slow growers follow?
Does it really need to push the idea that a new conflict is coming though? The US military moves people around with unclear (public) reasons often.
Can somebody just please tell me the name of the bird so I don’t have to click on a YouTube link?
Statistical modeling.
And yes, I am miffed about the use of the word “exponential” in this post’s title.
It’s a stretch to say that because they invest in a company, that they “produce” the greenhouse gases that that company emits.
Yeah, they could invest elsewhere but it’s just disingenuous to say they’re responsible for all those carbon emissions.
I believe black people’s lives matter. I hold that view so strongly that I’m willing to shout it in the streets. Does that make part of a political extremist movement?