janAkali

Viscera Cleanup Detail

Then you just wait until somebody enters in.
When the person opens the door you run to them and yell “wait wait wait” while frantically gesturing. After you enter - say quick “thank you” and disappear.

Tip: instead of making schedules, try to build habits.

Start with something small and make an effort to do it every single day for a month or every day of the week for three months.

The hardest part is to be consistent, so try to not skip more than one day.

You know what’s even more dissapointing? bc - arbitrary precision calculator for linux shell uses ‘l’ for natural log, just a single letter.
And there’s no other log function, so when you need logx(y) you write: ''l(y)/l(x)".

I like mongolian tea in the morning: very strong tea + half cup milk with butter and salt.

3gb CSV file goes brrrr…

Joplin (FOSS and probably general go-to for cross-platform open source notes in general but is a bit of a memory hog)

This comment describes my frustration with modern software.
How could a note taking app be a memory hog? You could type out a whole War and Piece and it shouldn’t take more than couple megabytes to store it.

Flatpaks and Snaps become more efficient in terms of storage usage the more you use them…

I’m not disagreeing with that, but how many apps an average user requires that he can’t find in the distro’s repository? And how many snaps he should have installed, so it’d be more space-efficient than appimages, 10? 20? 30?

hint: for me - one is too many.

Flatpak and Snap share dependencies while Appimage doublicates all of them…

On the other hand, appimage only includes the libraries actually required by an app. Where Snap/Flatpack install big fat runtimes.
I’ve recently made a very simple gtk4 app and packaged it with all dependencies into a 10mb appimage you can just download and run. The very same app would rely on 250+ mb gtk4 runtime with snap.
And I could be fine with that; but no, it’s not that simple, you’ll have x3 gtk4 runtimes on your system. Because snap keeps 3 last versions of every snap pkg and it’s dependencies. I don’t know what flatpack installs, but it’s not efficient in that regard either.

2-3 gigs of libraries a program might not even need. It’s just wasted space for an average linux user. And if I was fine with that, I would be using Windows right now.

Yes… kinda!?
First point is space requirement, second one is a design issue. They are directly connected, I’m not arguing that.

Unless you trying to replace half your system with appimages, appimages take less space in practice .

Yes, sizes might be inaccurate - it’s been about a year last time I tried snap or flatpak. All I remember is that snap installs around 300 mb gtk3 runtime and it’s often 2 or more of them, because different snaps might rely on different gtk versions + other dependencies.
And I remember that when snap and flatpak compared, allegedly flatpak requires more storage space.

I am aware that runtime sizes doesn’t scale with number of packages past maybe 3-4, but I have only 4 appimages on my system right now and they take ~200 mb, it is absurd that I’d need 10 times more space allocated for the same (or worse) functionality.

Appimages cant be easily ran from terminal, you need to link them to your Path.

On many distros “~/.local/bin” is already in PATH, that’s where I put my appimages, then make them executable and it just works.

Why I hate snaps/flatpak:

• 1
  • package/appimage ~80mb
  • snap/flatpak >500mb
• 2
  • p/a - app + dependencies
  • s/f - app + minimal linux distribution
• 3
  • p/a - can be easily run from terminal
  • s/f - flatpak run com.very.easy.to.remember.and.type.name

At the moment of separation of RSDRP mensheviks were in fact a minority of the party. And intersting enough, it’s not the given name, that’s what they named their faction after bolsheviks came up with their name.

It won’t work if we are already their demons.

We need a better tldr bot and also a tsdfln (too short doesn’t feel like a novel) bot.

Wikipedia cites this one: Ferguson, George (1976) [1954], “St. Nicholas of Myra or Bari”, Signs and Symbols in Christian Art, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, pp. 135–136

You can “borrow” this version for free: https://archive.org/details/signssymbolsinch0000unse/ The story is at page 81. But there’re no more details, just the same short paragraph.

I guess it is a depiction of a miracle of resurrection. It could be saint Nicholas or similar to this story:

One story tells how during a terrible famine, a malicious butcher lured three little children into his house, where he killed them, placing their remains in a barrel to cure, planning to sell them off as ham. Nicholas, visiting the region to care for the hungry, saw through the butcher’s lies and resurrected the pickled children by making the sign of the cross.

In russian we have a phrase “грибной дождь” (mushroom rain) for light warm rain in the sunshine.

It’s the best weather for mushroom growth and is therefore a sign to go harvest them in the woods soon.