![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/CJ7moKL2SV.png)
Well, COVID struck the silent generation most, so if anything that generation rolled a natural 1 on their d20 dice.
This bear don’t care
Well, COVID struck the silent generation most, so if anything that generation rolled a natural 1 on their d20 dice.
It answers my question, and it also answers why social democracies with free markets aren’t considered by socialists and communists as actual socialism, and more of a hybrid that serves to lessen the yoke of oppression, but does nothing tangible to progress.
However, I must ask, would a lack of a nation cause a lack of organization? Would we be able to band multiple collectives in order to create, for example, a space program?
How would knowledge be distributed? Consolidated? How would Law function?
How would these issues be addressed in a Communist world?
Thank you! Given the amount of downvotes, I suspected nobody was going to give me an actual answer. Glad you proved them wrong and didn’t mistake my curiosity for internet trolling.
I understand your premise here, and it has a fair share of logic behind it, but how would such a thing happen?
Besides a global Bastille day, that is.
So only after a period of acclamation (violent or not, irrelevant) will society reach this state.
Ok.
How do you deal with resistance? From other people to other nations while you de-nation-fy?
Is that the utopian vision or something claimed to be possibly achievable?
That is the most unrealistic manga I have ever seen.
Thank you!
Definitely a valid expression for when liberals dress up self interest in the guise of principles of freedom.
Not hipocrisy when the left parties enforce the tyranny of the majority though. In that case, the criticism becomes strawman fallacy.
…
I’m sorry that one whooshed so high over my head I can see it twinkling in the sky.
By vote, not by action.
If a liberal suppresses your freedom of speech and you are not calling for the destruction of his government (full constitutional change that doesn’t include the entirety of the people or at the very least, prevents the majority’s tyranny) he is not a liberal.
Mmm, fair point. I was considering bread as a singular object and not a category.
If they persecute you for having a different opinion that doesn’t enforce anti-tolerance, then they are not liberals.
What would you call a baguette sliced horizontally and stuffed with good things?
Normally, If I’m wrong I concede. If I was confidently wrong, I also apologize.
But I never do any of that if they’re cunts. Never reward cuntdom in debate!
This is how it went for me:
“Easy there, zealot girl!” “Fair point. You still crazy.” “You’re lucky I’m a rogue and there’s no other tank around.”
Lae’zel flirts
“… I… I’m sorry you what now?”
2 erotic text lines in involving sweat
“You nasty space freak! … Of course we gonna bump uglies.”
Who are you and how are you reading my mind?
What people here are saying is that if you check the EULA, you’ll see that under section 2. First clause, you are LICENSED to use the software on you device per 1 person only.
There’s also a privacy clause which I find to be an apology by a lion before it eats the Zebra.
Microsoft are gargantuan because they operate like an organized crime family charging protection.
Now imagine that your home directory is a network mount where only the user has permissions.
What is this summer you speak of? There is only air conditioning.