Nope. Still propaganda. It has a negative cultural connotation but any form of persuasive rhetoric fits the basic definition of propaganda.
Nope. Still propaganda. It has a negative cultural connotation but any form of persuasive rhetoric fits the basic definition of propaganda.
And I think restricting context and acting like anything started recently is an inaccurate way to frame what’s going on. This conflict has been going on far longer than a week. Wars don’t just pop up out of nowhere, they are based on context from before the war.
Hamas didn’t exist at the start of the conflict actually. They formed in response to and with funding from Israel in the 80s and 90s.
Removed by mod
Except for this one it sounds like
I mean it’s something that was declassified 50 years after it mattered. It’s not contemporary public messaging but private classified information withheld during the time it was most relevant.
You’ve admitted to spamming sexual content towards people that didn’t ask. Harassing them with said sexual content in fact. You can talk all you want about defamation but you literally admitted to it, you just don’t like thinking about the fact that what you did is literal sexual harassment.
Sexual assault and harassment aren’t just legal concepts you empty headed moron. You harassed someone with sexual content so why don’t YOU stop trying to weasel out of definitions to protect your ego.
This extremist angle you’re on is pretty bizarre ngl. It’s an interesting deflection from how much of a creep you are and are proud to be but it’s completely incoherent because it’s based on your idiotic assumption that sexual harassment can only ever be a legal term.
Why would I delete my comments? There needs to be context so people can see just how gross of a weasel you are, hiding behind legal bullshit to downplay the reality that your are proud of committing sexual harassment.
Unironically thanks for at least owning what a piece of shit you are. Next time you get angry why don’t you squeeze a stress ball instead of spamming people with sexual content they didn’t ask for. That way you might have a bit of leverage to pretend like you aren’t just an odious creep with no respect for human dignity.
I eagerly await your next nonsensical rant on how I’m extreme for calling your disgusting behavior out. Hopefully you’ll try an angle that isn’t a desperate stretch.
Did I say I was perfect?
No.
What means am I justifying? You’re the one defending sexual harassment.
You’re trying so hard to turn something back on me when the reality is that you think sexual assault is funny and okay if the specific instance isn’t listed in legal documents in your geographic location.
The difference between us is that you think sexual harassment is justified if your precious ego is upset.
Keep trying, each of your diatribes have been more desperate to morally equivocate us and it’s hilarious watching you cope.
At the very least you’re perfectly okay with admitting what a waste of oxygen you are. Shame you don’t take the next step to self reflect on how you could not be an asshole.
The only thing more repugnant than an asshole is someone that gleefully wears the title with pride.
I never said it was illegal chucklenuts. I said it was despicable. Keep coping, it won’t end up making you a good person suddenly but at least everyone else can have a clear understanding of how disgusting you are.
Your morals justify sexual assault and harassment. You’re a scum fuck with backwards self serving beliefs. You’ll never even see how gross you are because most people aren’t so pathetic to pull what you unashamedly admit to doing.
By all means rant some more, it won’t change what you’ve already admitted too, it’ll just make you come across clearer as the sleazy loser you are.
Edit: also what the fuck is that massive projection in your “devils advocate” bullshit? You sound even more unhinged.
I didn’t say it was against the law. I said it was sexual assault. Justifying it is disgusting. They upset you so you spam them with extreme porn, it’s such childish logic to justify scum behavior.
I’d ask you to consider the inverse where you get spammed with snuff porn or something because you upset someone but I don’t think empathy is something you care about. Just assuaging your ego after feeling disrespected.
You’re objectively a bad person based on your position.
Sending people extreme porn because you’re upset is still sexual assault you fucking creep. Them having money doesn’t change the fact that you’re literally bragging about sexual assault.
More like you give a homeless person food and they start telling you how evil you are for not buying them an apartment and financing the rent for 12 months.
Donbas isn’t comparable. The government in Taiwan has had a continuous existence since before the CCP.
If the rebellious territories of the Donbas was actually a preexisting government that had all the rest of its territory taken in a civil war you might be onto something. In reality Ukraine gained sovereignty from imperial USSR and now imperial Russia wants to take it over again.
You have, LLMs don’t read because they aren’t intelligent or alive. They aren’t comparable to humans.
Show me in the US where there are minorities being paraded through the streets and gang raped. Show me the lynchings happening in the US right now.
Fuck if with your what about bullshit. I can imagine you responding in a similarly flippant manner about a similar occurrence in Rwanda. Because you only care about things to score ideological points.
People can agree on things you know. Assuming I’m an alt shows that you’d rather engage in conspiratorial thinking to act like there’s some threat rather than a more benign assumption that two different people on this website could hold comparable opinions, especially after the news coming from Manipur.
It’s amazing what you can accomplish when you let your people starve and allow brutal sectarian violence towards cultural minorities.
Probably because they’re a tankie actually. The kind of person whose ideology makes their perspective on America intensely hypocritical. It also incentives them to frame the situation disingenuously.
Obviously getting bombed and losing two full cities had nothing to do with their calculations of course, it could never be a complex situation with many angles. It was only because a country that spent tens of millions of lives fighting another front declared war. The nation that they recently trounced in their last encounter. Nothing to do with city erasing wmds.
Ps if you care about the worst casualties talk about the Tokyo firebombing. Blows the nuke death count out of the water but it wasn’t flashy so debate bros don’t care.
Keeping people like this off the road is one of the biggest reasons why every place needs robust public transportation systems.