Ok?, they weren’t and you know that, which means your response was meant to detract from the original argument and to prevent any further constructive communication.
Ok?, they weren’t and you know that, which means your response was meant to detract from the original argument and to prevent any further constructive communication.
All you’re complaining about here is that my biases are different from yours.
I’m not complaining about anything, I’m calling out your hypocrisy.
I’m pretty open about my biases dude,
You sure weren’t open about it in that comment I responded to.
I’ve been watching you for years dude, you don’t have room to talk about biases.
“Nobody is stopping you from explaining why the original posted story is wrong.”
Breaking news: There is a teapot orbiting Mercury.
Use your sources to prove it wrong.
It’s obvious they’re not talking about that type of liberal.
And so we went to war.
Nowadays blaming HAARP means they aren’t blaming Exxon. In the past I believe it was just conspiracy fodder.
This is where OP got “pro-US” from:
“Its become absorbed into that silicon valley surveillance-capitalist machine that commodifies users to sell ads and paid flairs, and propagandizes pro-US interests above all. Software technology being one of the last monopoly exports the US has, it would be naive to think that one of the top 5 most popular social media sites, where so many people around the world get their news, would be anything other than a mouthpiece for the interests of those same US coastal tech firms.”
Better just give everything to Russia then!
That’s not an argument from fallacy, they aren’t claiming they’re wrong.
“It’s just an exercise”
“It’s just a special military operation”
Your distractions will not work against me. Prove there isn’t a teapot orbiting Mercury. I want you to demonstrate for everyone here why that doesn’t make sense.