I only said it wasn’t ok to victim blame, I’m not at all saying discord is the victim.
I only said it wasn’t ok to victim blame, I’m not at all saying discord is the victim.
The article says the code was not hosted on discord. Even if it was, the code does not infringe on any Nintendo copyright. Having a grudge against discord doesn’t make it fair to victim blame
How about I share something from my own country. What I reckon is that only some of my data goes to the US government through Google, Microsoft etc. while the Chinese government controls corporations like tencent much more than the US government controls US corporations. Besides all that, services from Microsoft and Google are much harder to avoid than for example tiktok and Huawei. So the US is getting my data no matter what, I might as well limit how much of it goes to china.
I’m European and I definitely feel that way. I don’t like American spyware, but I trust the Chinese government much less than I do American corporations.
They’re fishing for people who think it’s important to have one because YouTube sponsorships told them so.
English is a second language to me, and at this point it’s probably the only commonly used word I consistently mess up. It usually ends up something like ‘nessecairy’
You should report them either way.
in belgium it’s probably the most popular messaging app.
In Belgium we mostly use Jan met de pet (“Jan with the cap”)
currently I’m in a campaign that plays without a regular schedule, joining a new campaign in late august, and my current DM has asked if I’d be interested in doing one more (although i think he means once the current one is wrapped up). on top of that I’ve been talking with some colleagues about doing one, and I’ll be running an introductory one shot sometime next month too. might need to trim it a little…
Ok so we can’t use ground new because of bias. Where do you suggest we go to get our news then. I agree that there will always be some bias but surely a system that gives you news from so many sources will be less biased than sticking to just one or two sources