True, but it’s less than a 10% difference. There’s a very big chance the recipe will work out either way

I disagree, with a passion.

It is soooo cluttered, so much useless redundant tags everywhere. Just give JSON or YAML or anything really but XML…

But to each their own i guess.

I always knew that THIS is how kidney beans looked, I’ve been lied to my whole life.

Investigation team: “We found 2,395 allegations against 800+ abusers”

This thread: how is this shit even news, priests fuck kiddies we know duh

We ingest proper amounts of fiber in our diets.

Quite the drama queen huh.

“Started accusing opponents he lost to of cheating”, there’s no plural there. It was the match against Hans Nieman.

Who, by the way, has been convicted of cheating and banned from competitions in the past. What a coincidence huh.

Also, I’m gonna need some references on when did Magnus sent anyone to harass Hans, because as far as I know, that only happened in your head.

Is cool

Torvalds rejected the merge, and that’s pretty much what he said - no one is using bcachefs.

There’s no reason for a “fix” to be 1k+ lines, these sorts of changes need to come earlier in the release cycle.

Makes a lot of sense, not gonna lie.

That sounds more accurate. Woke: adjective that characterizes any action or statement that goes against a bigot’s opinion.

This. Full AMD on my last build as well.

I don’t care about any corp, I was looking at best bang for buck at the time. I was shocked how everyone I knew was like you should get this intel or that Nvidia, and when I asked why not <comparable performance AMD at 2/3 the price>, all I was getting back was marketing blabber.

Think of the poor shareholders!

inundates you with porn which might not be what you’re going for at the moment

Oh. How… Uh… I’ll be right back.

Technically, isn’t this a different thing? Genuinely asking.

There could be a license that forbids use (sort of like the CC no commercial use license) but still allows the code to be reviewed publicly, no?

Maybe this invention revolutionised how we clean our butts, or maybe it was utterly trivial and 20 different ways of cutting paper rolls were patented that same year (note that present day rolls don’t even use this method).

But that’s irrelevant to the point that seems to be implied here that patents somehow contributed to it’s success. They don’t, an invention will be useful or not based on its own merits, not on the fact they’re patented.

They exist to ensure whoever registered it makes a profit, which is why they’re being exploited way past the point of making up for any good they were supposed to bring…

Suppose someone was on the fence here, and willing to hear you out instead of believing OP.

Because, as I said, while I agree with most of what you said, you’re doing a big disservice to spreading your message.

I understand very well the implications of the negative price, which is why I advocated NOT to spend trillions in nuclear, when issues of balancing demand and production can be solved for a fraction of what nuclear costs.

I agree with most of what you’re saying, but the way you’re presenting it is almost confrontational.

True, self-diagnostic in a strict sense isn’t a thing, but as you point out after, a collection of symptoms can speak to one’s experience. Finding this insight, in my case, was an eye opening moment because so many things in my past and in my day to day suddenly started to make sense.

Coming to terms with this realization is especially useful for people who have strong negative views on mental health issues, and driving people to “self-diagnostic”, as in recognizing that they may be neuro divergent, is a worthy effort.

It doesn’t replace actual professional help and diagnosis, but it’s a first step that needs to be encouraged.

This.

Also, tie together more countries’ power grids to even out production and demand of renewables, and reduce the need for other backup sources.

For a fraction of the cost of nuclear, increase the storage capacity as well. We’ve had days where the price per MWh was negative in many hours, because of excess production.

The barriers to carbon free energy aren’t technical, they’re purely political.

So the innovation that was patented is literally “cut it partway through”.

Patents are inherently stupid and only serve to stifle progress. Change my mind or otherwise just downvote away, works as well.