• 0 Posts
  • 60 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 18th, 2023

help-circle









  • Dolphin is AFAIK by far the best file manager on Linux. And it is more than decent.
    By decent I just mean ability to do basic stuff, like open terminal in current directory, create symbolic links, having detailed list view as default, open root instance, easy switching between 1 and 2 panels, tabs for quick navigation between multiple directories. Easy access to removable drives.

    But I think almost all file managers for Linux have all that now. I’m currently using Thunar because I’m using XFCE, but I recently configured a laptop with KDE for a friend, and I must admit, I’m strongly considering going back to KDE. It was just such a pleasant experience to work with, my only gripe is that I can’t make shortcuts on the numeric keypad, and I use that for window tiling.
    It’s such a weird omission in KDE/QT, that it doesn’t recognize the numpad properly? If they have fixed that, I’ll go back to KDE instantly.


  • I was tired of Microsofts monopolistic shenanigans. So when Ubuntu 5.10 came out in 2005, and was extremely well done, it was time to switch to Linux. Because Linux was finally polished and functional enough to actually be at least as good as Windows.
    Admittedly there were a period of dual booting for games. But that isn’t necessary today, as we now have thousands of games that work on Steam.

    You can say that what it took for me, was for Linux to become good enough to use as a daily driver. I’d say today it’s a no-brainer.

    When Gnome 2 was discontinued, it was a major pain in the ass though, KDE was buggy and Gnome shell was hell (IMO). So I can’t say I never looked back, because I did install Windows 7 in frustration. But that was a very short adventure, because Windows is simply so horrible when you get used to Linux. The idiocy of Windows is momentous, and the jumping through hoops fighting Microsoft stupid security features, that won’t even allow you a simple thing as changing your default text editor, becomes insanely tiresome and frustrating very quickly.

    So it was back to Linux faster than you can say oops (almost).
    Now the desktop has become less relevant to me, because I do almost everything through hotkeys. So I rarely navigate the desktop, so as long as I have a decent file manager, I’m 90% OK just having that.




  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoAndroid@lemdro.idOnePlus Nord 4 review
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    OK, I looked at the link you provided, and the Dimensity 9200+ is rated faster than the Snapdragon 7+ gen 3 with a score of:

    1. box (Cyan) 199,1 vs 178,9 Mobile phone/tablet chip comprehensive performance ranking
    2. box (blue) 146,8 vs 146,2 (even) Mobile phone/tablet chip CPU performance ranking
    3. box (yellow) 321,8 vs 255 Mobile phone/tablet chip GPU performance ranking
    4. box (red) 120,8 vs 114,5 Mobile phone/tablet chip GPU performance ranking

    So the Dimensity 9200+ is similar in CPU speed, and the 8200 Ultra is similar in CPU speed to 9200+ (slightly faster), according to tests between Xiaomi 13T (Dimensity 8200 Ultra) and Xiaomi 13T Pro (Dimensity 9200+).

    PS it’s a very cool page, so I made the effort to translate what the numbers actually were. Thanks for good info. ;)




  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoAndroid@lemdro.idOnePlus Nord 4 review
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    OK, then you may prefer the Dimensity 8200 Ultra, this is still faster then Snapdragon 7+ gen3, and more power efficient than Dimensity 9200+, but uses Mali graphics instead of Immortalis, still good for gaming, but not as good as the 9200+, and it’s cheaper too, which could make room for better camera. ;)


  • Buffalox@lemmy.worldtoAndroid@lemdro.idOnePlus Nord 4 review
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Snapdragon 7+gen 3 makes it worth it IMO.

    Yes that’s definitely an upgrade, but there are lots of better SOC now, they could also have used the Dimensity 9200+, which is comparable to Snapdragon 8 gen 2. And even the Dimensity 8200 Ultra would have been better.

    No charger in the box is a scummy move

    Yes and the price is allegedly the same, we expect improvements, like better SOC and Camera, but not at the cost of making other things worse.

    I’m not impressed by IPS 65, No-charger, Snapdragon 7+ gen 3, and worse camera , if they want to make a “flagship killer”.
    IMO the Alu-body ads nothing over a good synthetic back, that is lighter thinner more durable, protects the phone better and is cheaper.
    The only thing worse than Alu is glass.

    But that’s probably subjective, others may love their choices?