• Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Two people of equal drunkness can do whatever they want because there’s no power imbalance*.

    But someone who’s a single drink in shouldn’t have sex with someone who’s absolutely hammered, and someone who’s absolutely hammered shouldn’t force themselves on someone who’s blackout drunk (because that’s literally rape)

    Edit:

    *Obviously, all other rules that would apply to non-drunk people also apply. I’m not saying they can like, murder each other or anything.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not necessarily true though. A person who really wants to get with someone who has turned them down, goes over when they are vulnerable, knowing they are vulnerable, and plies them with alcohol - that’s still potentially assault. If both parties are drunk, the presumption is not explicitly rape like it would be if there was such a power imbalance, but it isn’t a free pass either.

      If your sex partner is intoxicated, it will always raise the stakes, regardless of whether you are also intoxicated. It means you need to be very sure this person wants to sleep with you.

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you’re misunderstanding what I meant but that may be my fault.

        Would “Two people of equal drunkness can do whatever under the same terms and conditions as two non-drunk people” be better?

    • 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh and the bullshit in this is that two drunk people should not be able to consent if one drunk person is not able to consent. But go on, get hammered, get laid. Maybe you will die of liver cirrhosis.

          • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No.

            Being able to consent means being able to both understand what you’re consenting to and being able to communicate that you consent to it.

            A drunk person can’t understand what they’re consenting to and, after certain levels of drunkenness, can’t communicate their consent either. Therefore they can’t consent. You, being sober, should know this and therefore shouldn’t take advantage of them. If you do take advantage of them, then that makes you a rapist.

            As the other commenter pointed out, I hope the women around you know you’re not a safe person to be around.

              • 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m very thoughtful and delicate regarding consent and am not going to let some asshat tell me that I’m “not safe to be around”.

            • 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You do realize that there are different levels of drunkenness right? So a person who drank one beer can not consent anymore, is that what you are telling me?

              • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You do realize that there are different levels of drunkenness right

                Literally re-read what I said.

                So a person who drank one beer can not consent anymore, is that what you are telling me?

                If the person can’t handle the beer then it cannot consent. If you’re sober and they’re drunk then you are raping them.

                There’s 2 questions that must be asked in these situation

                1. did she consent to it before being drunk?

                2. is she capable of still understanding what’s going on and guve/remove consent?

                If the answer to any one of these is “no”, “wellll”, “idk”, “I think/guess so”, or anything other than a very clear yes then she can’t consent. And when in doubt, assume the answer is no.

      • Lanthanae@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So since I don’t drink I can’t hookup with drunk girls?

        No. Also I hope the women you know are aware that you are not a safe person to be around.

        • 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting that you know me so well from one comment. Share your wisdom Internet Wizard :)) How did you become all-knowing?

          • EuroNutellaMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How did you become all-knowing?

            Probably from reading the part in your comment which says:

            So since I don’t drink I can’t hookup with drunk girls? Sounds like BS to me.

            • 1draw4u@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you really are all-knowing, Internet Warrior? Show me the powerful way to becoming a keyboard ninja then, please!