• LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being protective of your good fortune at the expense of others is itself part of an ideology, so I don’t see why you felt the need to contradict and condescend. A person who’s not a piece of shit would have no business being a conservative, no matter how privileged they are.

    Now go argue with someone else because I’m getting big reddit energy from you, and it’s making me anxious.

      • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get their point - the “greedy [expletive]” part was insulting and unnecessary. But I do think they are overreacting quite a bit…

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Next time, either be considerate and don’t lead with a debatelord’s tone, or don’t comment at all if you can’t resist being an argumentative prick

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How about I express myself as I see fit, and you compose yourself for the next time someone writes in a way that makes you feel “anxious” yet at the same time unable to control the urge to lecture them.

          Who are you to tell me how I should express myself?

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            When you treat people like shit and throw pointed words at them, I’m going to call you out for it. I don’t owe you an apology.

            But fair enough, I’ll block you. I had my fill of you neckbeards during my miserable tenure on reddit, and I never want to speak to you again.

            • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Whom did I treat like shit in your opinion? I have not addressed anyone except nameless politicians.

              Maybe spend less time arguing with people you say you don’t want to argue with and more on improving your reading comprehension

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I understand that the last paragraph of their comment was unnecessary and inflammatory, but this (insults etc) is not the way to point that out…

    • natebluehooves@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only big reddit energy was this comment and the subsequent doubling down. The comment above was an even handed rebuttal, this response is tone policing and name calling.

      You may disagree with his rebuttal but this is not how you respond to adversity.

      • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand why they even went so off the rails. I just gave an addition to their statement which I prefaced with positive affirmation, to make sure the following text isn’t misinterpreted as ridiculing them in their effort.

        Granted I l maybe shouldn’t have cursed as much, but I didn’t even insult anyone specifically, not even republicans as some other people suggest. Just the political leadership that is complicit in suppressing the needed change to save our ecosystem and remedy the ridiculous inequality mankind has to endure.

        Apparently that’s enough to make them block me and then continue to rant about me in random comments.

        Guess im done with this conversation, it turned weirdly toxic for no fault of mine.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wow, what a hot take. I’m so thankful you stepped in to defend the debatelord. What a great use of your time!

        Just a tip: If you have nothing constructive to add to a conversation, keep it to yourself. Have fun on my blocklist.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        And I think you ought to keep your thoughts to yourself, if you have nothing worth contributing besides haughty arrogance and presumption.

        Besides, I did read their whole comment. That’s what I responded to.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s EXACTLY MY POINT. If someone agrees with you, then why lead with something as pretentious and haughty as “Not to knock your worthy efforst, but…”

            Why talk down to someone like that and adopt the tone of a pretentious debatelord when you ultimately agree with the other person?

            I encountered people like that all over reddit, so I recognize them – the type of people who think any conversation is a debate that you must “win.” It’s precisely because he does agree with me that I’m so miffed.

            • irmoz@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              They weren’t being pretentious or haughty. They amended one of your statements because it was a little inaccurate, then agreed that your wider point is correct. Because, yes, “wanting to hold on to what you have earned” is indeed an ideologically driven position

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                it was a little inaccurate

                It wasn’t, though. There was nothing I said that needed amending, nor nothing they said that effectively amended. And they weren’t called upon to do so. They could have said the same exact thing without coming off like a prick.

                • irmoz@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It was, because like I said, it is ideological. You said it wasn’t. After I’ve explained my point, you can’t just say “nuh uh”.

                  • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    What?? You need to go back and re-read who said what. I said it is ideological. It’s the other guy who said that it’s not.

                    Are … you replying to the wrong user? Oh gods, do you think I"m … him? 🤮

        • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Let’s please keep this civil. I respectfully disagree, but I have no problem with you voicing your opinion. The issue is your assumption that the person who disagrees with you is a horrible individual, simply because they have a different opinion. I don’t even care who’s right at this point - we can debate an issue without insulting each other. And even if you’re enraged by it, hiding that fact and calmly countering their opinion with logic is far more effective at winning over an audience…

          Edit: Before any accusation of unfair treatment is made, I’d like to clarify that I disapprove of the original comment’s rhetoric as well - there was no good reason to insult conservatives (“greedy [expletive]”) like they did.

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            What the fuck are you even talking about? Conservatives should be systemically and socially deplatformed and disenfranchised.

            My issue with the person I was speaking to was the haughty arrogance they led with, presuming to argue with me about… what? Nothing they said contradicted what I was saying; yet, they come at me like a debatelord?

            And now you have the arrogance to lecture me on the correct take ™? Literally cis white male energy. stfu

            • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              There wasn’t any “haughty arrogance,” they were just adding on to what you said with their view, and (from my understanding) were attempting to be polite by clarifying how your point still stands. Not everything is an argument…

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not everything is an argument…

                What the fuck? The irony of you pointing this out to me when the other guy leads with things like ““Not to knock your worthy efforts, but…” like a pretentious debatelord who’s full of himself. I agree that not everything is an argument, which is exactly why I was calling him out.

            • ℛ𝒶𝓋ℯ𝓃@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was trying to help explain why I think people aren’t exactly reacting positively to your critique (and I could be wrong, but to me it comes across as overly inflammatory). I’m very sorry if it came across as disrespectful.

              And there is no “correct take”, it just seems, in my opinion, a bit counterproductive to be insulting. Sorry if it came across as “cis white” mansplaining…

              Sincerely,

              A queer, brown liberal NB furry.

              (p.s. - I’ll overlook the misgendering and whitewashing since, in the heat of debate, I failed to introduce myself with pronouns. Although I am confused as to whatever my race has to do with it. And sorry if my language sounds “arrogant” or “too formal” - I’m autistic, this is literally how I talk…)

              • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m genuinely sorry for misgendering you and for bringing race into it. It’s not that people aren’t reacting positively to my critique. I don’t care about that. It’s the other person talking down to me like I’m a fool or a child and he’s in some formal debate that he has to “win.” The last thing I need are other people inserting their opinions into the mix about how I should speak politely to that person when he was being such a cock.

                And what I meant by “cis white male energy” is people feel the need to tell you their opinion, to the point that multiple people are dogpiling you telling you the same thing, none of which ever addresses the real issue.