Need a plate of generic, insipid platitudes with a giant helping of bad science and misogyny?

  • AyyLMAO@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    the board’s ruling was an infringement on his free speech, but since they’re a private board

    Free speech applies to the private sphere in Canada? It seems like that would have implications on every social media platform, search engine, and so on.

    • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a bit of a gray area. The issue, as far as I can tell, is whether or not he’s speaking in a professional manor on his social media, as he would be expected to with any patient he sees.

      • AyyLMAO@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        But where is the government in this context? The license is through a private board.

        • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s an issue of what a private board can cover and enforce their rules over and what they can’t. Anything they can’t is government.