and I am really not impressed. I don’t want to know more about the story, don’t want to build a spaceship that I can fast travel with, don’t want to explore the universe.

What are your thoughts?

  • echo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It looks like Skyrim in space and I don’t really get why anyone was expecting something else

    • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? There was this one guy on Lemmy the other day expecting the game to be like Freelancer… Like, dude, it’s Fallout with a space suit, we’ve known that for years now. I feel like gamers always have the most stupid and unrealistic expectations imaginable.

  • Mojo@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not as open and “huge scale” as people seem to think it is.
    It’s kind of “fake open” if that makes sense.
    You cannot get into your ship and fly 500m east to your mission.
    If you do that, a new instance is loaded and your mission is not there.

    Made me disappointed.

    • Joker@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, what? How does that work? I haven’t seen much of the game except trailers.

      • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s no flying in atmosphere at all. To do what the parent commenter says would require going back to orbit (loading screen) then choosing a spot on the planet to land (another loading screen). When you land like that on planet, it generates an instance for you that is procedurally generated, but won’t contain any of your mission markers. (I haven’t actually tried that part, but I’ve seen others talk about it.)

        The game is basically areas, separated by loading screens. You get in your ship, that’s a loading screen, you fly to orbit, another loading screen. Then in orbit if you want to go to another planet, you set course and do another loading screen. Once there, you choose a spot and land for another loading screen. There is flying in space, but it’s limited to small instances with some other ships, and POIs. Your ship’s speed is very slow, and as far as I’ve been able to tell you cannot walk around your ship while it’s in flight (this may be a limitation of the controller controls, I saw a streamer stand up in flight, but I don’t know if that was a bug or not. There’s no binding to stand up when you are in flight on controller.) I just wasn’t holding B long enough, you can stand up when you are in space, you just have to hold the normal binding for longer than I expected.

        All that being said, I’m still enjoying the game. But I went in with low expectations.

        • evranch@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What you describe sounds almost exactly like the Mass Effect 1 procedurally generated missions. But that game came out in 2007…

          • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mass Effect 1 has the Mako though. In Starfield, as far as I know there are no ground vehicles at all. So it’s just a lot of running.

            • Sidyctism@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I mean to be fair, maybe starfield is better off without ground vehicles if the alternative is the mako

              • SenorBolsa@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It Mako me angry. There’s enough there I think it would be nice to have a little rover that could go like 30 mph and haul your loot.

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People are getting pretty spicy with the responses. OP was just underwhelmed by a game getting a lot of hype. Like lots of people are going to like it, but not everyone. I think theyre just trying to generate discussion, not say “everyone who likes starfield is an CHUMP!!” or something.

  • RaineV1@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, yeah, if you aren’t into the core elements of a game you probably won’t be interested in the game. It’s like say, “I’m not impressed with the new Mario game. I don’t want to do platforming, and I don’t care about powerups or collecting things.”

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally I’m excited to see what the mod landscape is going to look like in a year. As with most Bethesda games, I couldn’t care much less about the game itself outside of that key feature.

  • snowbell@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is exactly as shitty as I expected it to be. Another crappy bethesda game in a long line of garbage. I think the last game from them I truly enjoyed was Morrowind. I don’t think New Vegas counts. Fallout 4 was depressing being so close to good. Every moment in that game screams half baked. That quest where you help the robots out with their ship showed me just how possible it was to make the game good, but then it was the only good quests besides maybe the silver shroud one.

  • ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like you simply don’t like science fiction video games then. Thanks for letting us know. I’m gonna go play some Starfield now.

    • slaytswiftfan@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      what lol — he doesn’t like starfield so that immediately means he doesn’t like science fiction games??

      I’m a huge scifi and fantasy fan and I refunded starfield after 4-5 hrs

  • irongamer@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a space clutter looter

    Played 8 hours last night so this is a very early impression. I love clutter looters and didn’t expect much else from Bethesda’s Fallout/Scrolls main studio. The Bethesda crafted areas are excellent if you are looking for what I call a Fallout / Elder Scrolls clutter looter. Lots of stuff to loot, the FPS combat is much better than Fallout 4 or 76. Don’t expect a space sim like SC or NMS this is a Bethesda Fallout/Scrolls style game with a bunch of additional systems on top of it.

    First person combat

    I’ve played both SC and NMS. While exploring a station in Starfield I thought to myself… this is what SC should have been for their foot exploration. The derelict stations in NMS are rather static environments and never cared for them much. What surprised me about the Starfield AI is they will “flee” or “flank” by running past you at times. I’ve lost track of enemies at times because of this and have had to go hunting for them.

    Ship travel

    There is fast travel. If you are looking for a space flight sim this is not for you. I don’t have an issue with fast travel as I get no thrills from traveling in space 1:1. There is simulation and there is stupid… SC leans a bit too heavy into the latter. Don’t expect 1:1 space travel in Starfield, it isn’t made for that.

    Ship combat

    Again this is not a space flight sim. Most recently coming off Everspace 2 I do miss the strafing controls and pedal usage, but that game is star fighter like combat. Starfield does have a ship editor and seems to be more about load out than fighter style combat. Think a bit more like Expanse style combat. I don’t have much time in this area of the game so I can’t say a whole lot more about it.

    Initial impression

    I love Bethesda clutter looters and this one is in space. Going to eat up the Bethesda crafted clutter looter areas. The 1,000 worlds will likely function as a massive canvas for future mods.

    • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are strafing controls, but I think you have to have at least one rank in Piloting the game calls it thrusters. Hold space to enable strafing controls (on controller it’s hold RB and then use the left stick to strafe up, down, left and right. I don’t know exactly how it works on M+KB.)

    • banana_havoc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s ironic because no man’s sky does ship combat and ship travel so much better than starfield

  • Mechaguana@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally from the screenshots and the vids I didn’t feel like the game would be for me. Is there actual story? Are there fun characters to hang with?

    Bethesda games have quite a recognizable formula, and this seems like their blandest implementation.

    But hey, i am basing this on the other games and a handful of material. Ill probably crack it and wait for it to lower in price big time.

    • Ser Salty@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, the story/stories and characters are the actual meat of the game. It’s not a space sim like Star Citizen or NMS, it’s an RPG first and foremost, really.

      Also, so far (~20 hours in) it’s way less bland than Fallout 4. It’s a way more of an RPG (I talked my way out of confrontations multiple times, sometimes even using my background and traits, when relevant). Sure, if you just keep landing on planets and going to the auto generated structures and scanning wildlife, it’s probably gonna be quite bland. But there’s way more actual content, way more actual quests that aren’t just clearing out bandits/raiders. The space sim-y stuff, that’s just there to sell the fantasy. Yes, you can be a bounty hunter or space trucker or whatever, but that content is of course going to be way more autogenerated, bland stuff. I’d recommend doing that stuff on the side, when you want a break from story heavy quests.

      But even clearing out raiders is often waymore fun in Starfield, especially when it’s in space. For example, I came across an abandoned zero-gravity casino space station that spacers (one of this games version of raiders and bandits) were in, while I was on my way to the space cowboy city, and that was a very fun fight.

      Another time, I was heading back to New Atlantis when I noticed a symbol for a ship in the same system. When I went to investigate, I first got into a dogfight with another ship, disabled their engine and borded them, then I noticed there was some kind of heavy freighter they were raiding, so I docked with that. On that ship, the engines were funky and as they were turning on and off the gravity was going, too, so I was fighting my way through a ship where the gravity was constantly fluctuating, which then also factored into small environmental puzzles, like waiting for the gravity to turn off to go up an elevator shaft. Eventually got to into the vault the space pirates were trying to get into, and although I couldn’t get all of it because I didn’t have a high enough lockpicking skill (the new lockpicking minigame is also kinda fun, ngl), but I did pick up some contraband. When I then finally actually went to New Atlantis, the contraband was caught by the scanners, I was arrested and then forcibly conscripted to go undercover into the Crimson Fleet (the space pirates), although I could’ve killed my way off the ship they brought me to if I wanted. Then the contact to get into the Crimson Fleet was actually the same person that gave the orders to attack that freighter I found! (There was an audiolog, because of course.) Sorry for going off on a tangent, I just felt like it would illustrate my point better than just saying “it good”

      I also probably have like 5 other quests in my quest log to go join some faction, some big factions, some small factions. And that’s without even going to the cyberpunk city.

      And so far I haven’t had to follow a dog for 20 minutes in search of a chainsmoker, so that’s already better than Fallout 4.

      • Crotaro@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please don’t apologize for the tangent. It’s giving me high hopes that I’m going to like the game despite the flaws and (probably mostly legit) criticism of reviewers.

        • Ser Salty@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you need a little more hope, I keep stumbling into cool and unique handcrafted locations and encounters all over the place, just doing side stuff, like, I just delivered two passengers and in doing so found two unique locations in the target star system. I originally feared it was mostly the three major cities getting the handcrafted stuff, but nope, there’s a ton of it out there.

          Yes, there’s a lot of loading screens, but, honestly, I hardly even realize they’re there because they are legitimately just like 2 seconds on PC.

          • Crotaro@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks, that’s pretty cool! I did fear that a lot of Bethesda’s traditional environmental storytelling would be gone.

  • totallynotfbi@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s pretty decent if you liked Bethesda’s other AAA games. I was actually surprised that there was even some amount of spaceship piloting at all - I just assumed it would be 100% fast travel.

    However, the game runs like dogshit - even on my decently mid-range system, it takes 15-30 seconds of loading between menus, and I swear I spent half the time I played waiting for the game to load. I assume that this is meant to take advantage of the Xbox and PS5’s faster memory and DirectStorage, but on PC it’s borderline unplayable

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        not the guy, but I have mine on a Sata SSD and I don’t think my loading times are the same as his, so I’d expect either slow CPU or on a Hard Drive (going against the minimum requirements that the game should be played on a SSD)

  • Kra@mtgzone.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean the game is probably mediocre to okay, but why are they selling it for SEVENTY EURO? I mean wtf. If they want 70€ it should be outstandingly good. I would maybe buy it for 40€, but this greed is a hard pass for me.