Should put this whole issue to rest (for a while, at least 😉).

  • ampersandrew@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    One day they might. PC has taken a larger and larger market share as time has gone on. PCs became easier to game on, consoles became less streamlined, and perhaps even the closed-off nature of consoles compared to the open nature of PCs has played a role. But as of 2023, you’re still not making a $300 PC that plays games as well as an S. While consoles have become less streamlined, they’re still more streamlined than a PC.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’ve already established that the $300 box is not viable for much longer. And since it sold around 1/3 the numbers of the PS5, it didn’t even work as advertised.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Did we establish that? Most of the biggest games are not the hardest on system requirements. And while Microsoft would obviously prefer that they sold more Xboxes and reached more Game Pass subscribers (the 25M-30M is impressive regardless), I’d be surprised if they expected the majority of those to be Series S; but they probably did recognize that that customer base is still worth reaching. We’re just not at a point in the history of consoles where they all have the same business model anymore, like they did 20 years ago.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They compromised their higher end system with their lower end system. It’s time to admit they made a mistake here, and they are only now starting to fix it.