• Graylitic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Quick few things:

    -The CPC brought in Capitalists to rapidly develop, while maintaining full control and refusing to let Capitalists control the state. That’s why it’s incredibly authoritarian there, to prevent the Capitalists from controlling the state. Socialism is supposed to come after Capitalism, not Feudalism.

    -The CPC has stated intentions to become fully Socialist by 2050 and Communist by 2100.

    -Even under Mao, they weren’t “economically Communist.” They still had a state, still had money, and still had classes. They were Socialist, and still are, just with more of a mixed market.

    -Mao was an idiot, but it wasn’t Socialism or Communism that caused the starvation. It started as a naturally occurring famine (the last of its kind in China, actually), but Mao responded so stupidly he told his men to kill Sparrows that were eating rice. Well, those Sparrows were holding the bugs back, and without the Sparrows the bugs ate far more rice. Is that Communism? When no Sparrows? Or one really stupid leader?

    Finally, my eggs aren’t all in the China basket. I’m not a massive China stan like some people here, I’m very critical of them. Socialism and Communism are gaining in popularity in other places where Capitalism is declining, such as America.