• Guntrigger@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh I know rocks CAN be deadly. But so can lots of things. From the info in the article they were throwing rocks at cars, not IDF forces who are undoubtedly armoured to the teeth for greater stopping power than rocks.

    Just seems strange to shoot someone for not obeying when they aren’t directly threatening you, but the article is a bit light on actual details. Being the source that it is, I don’t think they would hesitate to highlight the IDF were defending themselves if they actually were.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Using a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death is much worse than possessing a deadly weapon. You think people in cars haven’t died from stone throwers before?

      • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand this logic. IDF literally shooting someone is somehow less of a “use of a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death” than throwing a stone at a car?

        I get that they deemed the person dangerous, but shooting someone for throwing a stone is a slippery slope to all sorts of things, eg. Kettled protesters who start throwing stones at riot police. Should the police just mow them all down because rocks can be deadly?

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why do you keep using arguments where stones are being thrown at police/army? These stones were being thrown at unarmed, unprotected humans.

          • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Stop being disingenuous. The rocks were thrown at cars. They weren’t interrupting a public stoning.

            • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Do you know how many people died from rocks thrown at cars? I’m not talking hypotheticals, I’m talking real deaths and injuries.

              • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Do you? I’d wager it’s considerably lower than deaths from shootings involving figures of authority.

                • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, you can keep moving the goalpost all you want, doesn’t make you any less wrong.

                  • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Me move the goalposts? What are you talking about? I’ve been maintaining the whole time that it’s potentially over the top to shoot someone with a gun when they are throwing rocks at cars, while admitting we don’t have all the facts om how it went down.

                    You on the other hand, keep coming back to me about different rock related dangers and vaguely alluding that shooting someone throwing rocks is fine whatever the scenario because rocks can be *hand wavy* amounts of dangerous.

                    You asked me if I knew the stats on rock throwing deaths. I don’t, but I assumed you would enlighten me seeing as you brought it up. Instead you accuse me of moving the goalposts when I’m still taking about the case in point.