Many in the crypto and privacy community mistakenly trust Telegram because it’s “end to end encrypted”, but there are huge issues including not hiding the metadata, censorship, centralization, and phone numbers.
Send this video to your friend that asks why you won’t join: https://video.simplifiedprivacy.com/why-telegram-sucks/

    • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep, E2E isn’t sufficient to ignore it being made by Meta, I def still trust Telegram more

        • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cause telegram has better UX, supports logging in on my 2 phones, can send uncompressed larger files, more appearance customization, etc

          I love Signal too but Telegram is also great

          • PeachMan@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair enough, the features are nice. I just want people to know that they’re compromising on security by using Telegram. But if you don’t have any REAL reason to be paranoid, then you don’t really NEED to use Signal.

            • N-E-N@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ye that’s how i feel. I scarcely send anything that I’m truly worried about and when I do, I’ll use their Private Chats or Signal

              P.s. I also love Telegram stickers tbh. Silly I know but they’re great

        • applejacks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          signal is busy running its app into the ground by removing its abilities as an SMS and adding stories.

          • PeachMan@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            So it removed a feature that had nothing to do with privacy and added a feature that doesn’t matter if you don’t want to use it? Wow how dare they.

            • applejacks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I used to be a big proponent of Signal.

              It was incredibly easy to have friends and family download the app and replace their SMS app with it.

              Almost zero change or learning curve on their end, and we all got increased security when we used it.

              Telling your parents to download yet another new app to talk to just you is a no-go and sabotaged their goal of increasing security for people at large.

              • PeachMan@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                1 year ago

                SMS is INCREDIBLY insecure, and it doesn’t surprise me that they dropped it. It risks giving a false sense of security to anybody who doesn’t understand encryption (like, you know, your parents). They’ll think that any conversation in Signal is secure when most of them probably aren’t.

                Signal isn’t “yet another new app”, it has been around for a decade and it continues to be the gold standard for E2E encrypted messaging. The fact that SMS still exists and people are stupid enough to use it does not mean Signal needs to maintain a feature that made their product inferior.

    • wischi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can sure it’s end to end encrypted because the client can be analyzed to verify that claim.