• rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    When you’re supporting ten thousand machines on four continents and confirming to twenty different data protection doctrines the last thing you need is some neckbeard rocking up demanding to store data in their unauditable homebrew fork of Haiku or some shit.

    • crispy_kilt@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What is achieved with GPOs and agents is compliance, not security.

      In other words, company issued devices don’t protect the data, but they ensure conformity with relevant regulations and standards. Which is what most organisations actually care about.

      Many good IT people really do care about actual information security, but not those in charge.

      The result are devices that hinder some people’s work but provide questionable actual security.