I’ve come across Red Hat allot lately and am wondering if I need to get studying. I’m an avid Ubuntu server user but don’t want to get stuck only knowing one distro. What is the way to go if i want to know as much as I can for use in real world situations.

  • eldavi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ime: red hat & centos dominate with ubuntu, debian, suse and amazon linux all a distant 2nd.

    i also expect it to change given red hat’s recent decision to stop sharing their source.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of my clients were using CentOS. Not sure what’ll happen next now that Red Hat killed CentOD.

  • nicman24@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    i dont get why people do not just use debian. especially if they got their own it person / support

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personal take: RHEL is a very high quality well integrated OS. Debian is a mess of community opinion all conflicting held together by outdated and poor tooling.

    • garam@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      No certification and no support. Critical bug will be fixed faster in RHEL than Debian when come to Enterprise, very clear structure and powerful consultancy.

      Debian consultancy never near RHEL, that’s why they need to work hard on that, and make industry standard.

      Red Hat drive the industry standard for more than 20 years… That make every Corp lean to it, and it won’t dwindling soon… Unless other are making Debian standardized.

      Ubuntu tried it, still not even taking chunk I guess? Mostly Enterprise is RHEL/Clones.

      • nicman24@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No certification and no support. Critical bug will be fixed faster in RHEL than Debian when come to Enterprise, very clear structure and powerful consultancy.

        that is just corp talk for “it is not my problem”

        I dont know ubuntu server, which i mostly use because of livepatch, with unattended upgrades seem to fare better than the rhel deploys that i have done - and the customer never updated. Granted the last is not enterprise but Uni bioinfo servers but still.

        • garam@lemmy.my.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, it’s not fully about corp talk. I also have some University use RHEL, well, I would argue, in university, some do use ubuntu because it easiness to install and maintain, welp… But selinux vs apparmor… better use selinux in EL than in Ubuntu… haha… *most junior sysadmin fvk tup in Ubuntu when set it up… so In the end they just use… Well, EL Clones :/

          But for research, I do agree, for NLP/ML, mostly I don’t see any EL Clones deployed in labs, most Prof use Ubuntu and Nvidia drivers… Scientific linux is well known then centOS stream, just they still don’t budge to move… this is hard to crack question, I never know why no EL, but I guess because ubuntu nvidia prefered driver done its best, better than CentOS/Fedora

  • zibby@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ive worked a couple fortune 500s that used ubuntu. If im using aws ill stick with their distro but most of time im happy with ubuntu. I think distro choice matters less and less. Most of the systems ive run recently have had ansible to configure them or have just run docker containers. Most of the gov contracts iveworked on insisted on red hat but honestly the teams making those decsions seemed the least technically capeable ive worked with and it was just a red tape issue to change distros

    • garam@lemmy.my.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think in fortune 500, it’s only fraction that use ubuntu/Debian, as most of marketshare hold by red hat, 95% as I remember last time. Than 3% of windows, less than that is everything else.

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Started with RHEL years ago, migrated to CentOS to get away from the license fees etc. Have since moved to Amazon Linux since we subsequently migrated everything to AWS.

  • borlax@lemmy.borlax.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    All of my personal servers are Debian. My last company switched their entire production fleet from centos to Debian. I think a lot of people switched to Debian back when the Centos Stream debacle went down.

  • calm.like.a.bomb@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I work at a big company: most of our customers are using RHEL when they use Linux. There are some customers that use SUSE for SAP workloads, but these are about 10% of all linux VMs.

  • enfluensa@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My current job is all Ubuntu LTS, my job before that was all CentOS, and my job before that was a mixture of Debian and FreeBSD.

  • biscuits@lemmy.sdfeu.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was working as a DWDM technician sometime ago and IIRC most of DWDM hardware (or at least the Infinera ones, as I had used those the most) were actually running on Gentoo, which was kinda surprising for me.

    But in “regular” environments I have mainly seen Ubuntu or Debian.