DickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agoStinglemm.eeimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1261arrow-down110
arrow-up1251arrow-down1imageStinglemm.eeDickFiasco@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareboogetyboo@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·2 days agoI’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
minus-squareFeydaikin@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoIt’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise. However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget. But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
minus-square_stranger_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoIt was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
minus-squareDickFiasco@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoIt’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.
I’ve never seen it. Was it any good?
It’s good if you want something more ‘close to the books’ story wise.
However, the Harkonnens are quite dialed back (they always are). And everything is low budget.
But personally, I enjoyed it and still re-watch it from time to time.
It was very much a product of its time. It was alright.
It’s enjoyable if you watch it in the context of it’s time. You can’t compare it to the Villeneuve version.