I’ve tried using it over the years but I never liked it because there was no information. So last night I looked at my local city and there is almost no information at all. I spent a few hours last night adding buildings and restaurants and removing incorrect items. It was actually kind of fun and therapeutic and I plan to do more of it tonight. My girlfriend thinks it’s dumb and I’m wasting my time because Google maps and Apple maps and Bing maps exists but she just doesn’t understand open source.

Edit: Apologies, I just realized this question is not Linux specific.

  • rmuk@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah. Story time:

    In the England we have ancient rights-of-way laws but a lot of private landowners try to block footpaths that cross their land. If a landowner can argue a footpath hasn’t been used in (I think) two years they can have it removed, but in 2025 all the existing footpaths will be made permanent and indelible except with explicit local government permission so between now and then a lot of landowners will be rushing to get paths removed.

    I’ve made a point of walking every footpath in my area and making sure they’re all documented on OSM. If any of the landowners try to get a path removed I have my GPS tracks as proof of use.

    Edit: FWIW, I find OSM to be the best map for rambling. Google and Apple don’t come close and OSM even gives Ordinance Survey a run for it’s money.

    • PhilBro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anecdote time: I was just in Yorkshire (first time in England) heard about the idea of public footpaths so we found one, walked it and had a picnic. Loved every second, ended up going through a sheep field then a cow field. Can’t wait to go back

    • Gmork@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is seriously awesome! Thank you for suggesting this.

      I have added a small amount of area around my city but this will make it much easier to fill in the gaps.

  • Beej Jorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve been editing OSM for years. (896,339 edits in 3,427 changesets, apparently!) For me, it’s all about the free data. I once got a thank you note from someone who worked for a city with a particularly large municipal park. I’d added almost all the trails to the park and other information, and they’d used it to produce a printed map for the general public. Exactly the kind of thing I’d hoped for!

    Personally, I do a lot of dualsport motorcycling and most backcountry maps around here are subpar. I map tons of trails and 2track and put them on the Garmin so I know where I’m going.

    OSM is also great in lots of Europe–tons of detail.

    JOSM is great.

    Someone just recommended Organic Maps for the phone–it’s way snappier than Google Maps, but still not great with finding addresses.

  • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have done 14k edits over six years. I too like it for being therapeutic. I’d rather do micro-edita on osm than play another level of candy crush. Same kind of reward but you are also helping out creating something larger!

    Honestly though, I don’t think osm will ever catch up to the commercial alternatives. Mostly because their harsh stance against automatic edits (and lack of version control). Also the lack of standardization is a problem. It’s very hard to create client applications because the data is structured way different in different regions.

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think the aim is necessarily to compete against commercial alternatives but rather to have a backstop/fallback if/when they fail.

      Also don’t forget LOTS of commercial providers use OSM data for their mapping. So eventually a lot of the data does make it into people’s hands.

  • JaxiiRuff@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    OSM is an awesome project I agree it is fun contributing to it but it is not as useful yet due to what you describe, details.

    Finding addresses and other specific information is very hit or miss in some areas. Especially in the US where no one really cares about it other than tech corporations using it for quick info like street layouts.

    My entire city has address numbers missing and for a long time I used an app on my phone (StreetComplete) to fix address numbers and other various details. But it can be overwhelming very quickly depending on how outdated or not updated your place is. Time you enjoyed wasting is not wasted time by the way.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve pulled data from the OSMs for building outlines & such For CAD landbase, so thanks for that.