The company’s headset exists to placate investors, not serve users’ needs
  • ThrowawayOnLemmy@lemmy.world
    0·
    8 months ago

    To me, this seems like a big misstep for Apple. Granted I’m no fanboy, but I’ve appreciated Apple’s design and products over the last few decades. This to me just seems half baked. And that’s not something I expected from Apple’s hardware. I personally don’t think I’ll ever wear a computer on my face for more than 30 minutes at a time. Even if the weight goes down dramatically, it’s just not a convenient experience. The last thing I need with my technology is more inconvenience.

    • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish
      0·
      8 months ago

      Well less than 30 minutes at a time is good because the Vision Pro battery only lasts around two hours and you can’t swap batteries without turning it off.

      You can do a lot of things with the Vision Pro that you can’t do with other headsets, but I don’t understand why anybody would want to manage their calendar events in VR, and it seems like there are a lot more things that you would want to do with the Vision Pro that you can’t. If it were really an AR device like a modern Google Glass it would make sense, but with that form factor and a battery life of two hours it can’t really become part of you like that.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
        0·
        8 months ago

        Are you aware that you can plug the battery into a power source and use the headset for as long as you want while the battery charges at the same time?

        • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
          0·
          8 months ago

          You can, but few people will. It’s not the image Apple wants the device to have. In their promotional videos, the people are constantly wearing the headset and never plugged in.